Pop Racism (Part 2)

** This post got all jumbled. I'm fixing it. Bear with me. **

My friend and I were talking about an article we saw where an artist had reimagined Disney heroines with different ethnicities. Here is the artwork in question:

I think this is fantastic. When I was a kid I never colored the characters in my coloring books the way they looked on the cover. Just as Billy Madison wanted to see what a blue duck would look like, I wanted to see a Green Panther or a Little Yellow Riding Hood. I wanted princes with pink hair to offer bouquets of black flowers to mermaids with blue skin on the beach. Once I gave a popular heroine 5 o'clock shadow and an Adam's apple. My siblings and I used to make copies of a picture so we could all get a chance to color it. No two were ever alike. To me the princesses above are enchanting and innovative, but also natural, like childhood and home.

Cinderella gives her opinion.

My friend, however, was really irritated by the wrong-colored princesses. She said that there was no need to make kid shows political and that people shouldn't be so sensitive about race. She said those characters were given the races we're used to because of story origin and for historical accuracy, and therefore they should be left alone. She basically made the same point as the Tumblr user I mentioned in a previous post. I said, "I don't think there's an agenda here. I think the artist was just making art."

Honestly, it's not even the most controversial or unusual fan art on the Internet. If you glance online - you don't even have to search very hard - you can find countless examples of this type of thing. I can almost guarantee that every character you've ever cared about has been reimagined with a different ethnicity, sex, species, or age, set in the wrong time and / or place, dressed in a strange costume or no costume at all, coupled with a new love interest (possibly someone from an unconnected story universe), and any other thing your heart could hope for. And that's just the artwork, to say nothing of literary fan fictions. It's what people do. Good stories will awaken creativity. Good story telling makes people want to join in.

I maintain that these experiments are mostly done for fun, but I am going to contradict myself little a bit: I think my angry friend is partially correct. 

Like her, I did notice that while all of the princesses were changed, none of them were changed to Caucasian, I simply wasn't offended by this. It's been said that no choice is made without some conscious or unconscious reason behind it. If there is a take away message from this project, perhaps it is that we could do with more variety in pop culture. Maybe the artist wanted people to start imagining things in ways we're not used to, regardless of tradition, and see what we can come up with, including but not limited to getting comfortable with seeing dark skin and non-European cultures. 

My friend said there was no need to make children's characters into a political platform, but I say there absolutely is a need for this type of thinking, and using beloved children's characters is a great way to get the message out there. If people are changing the stories and characters we're used to, it's because they lack something the fans are looking for. One question that my friend failed to ask is why so many more European stories were represented than other stories, and what affect this lack of representation may have on our society.

What if you were not represented in popular fiction? By that I mean, what if almost every imagined definition of beauty, icon of heroism, or wholesome image of a boy or girl next door had nothing to do with how you look? When everyone is white, it means that people of color aren't beautiful, or heroic, or smart, or relatable. It means they're not worth mentioning at all.

I remember being a little kid in the 80s and noticing that not only was almost everyone on TV white like me, but often the good guys were blond while the bad guys had dark hair and olive (though pale) complexions. Notable exceptions resided on Sesame Street and the Cosby Show.

I don't want to sound like I had some precocious understanding of race relations. Maybe a little, but mostly I had a self-centered desire to be unique. I remember being sick of my appearance by the time I was 8 because everywhere I looked I saw blond white people. I felt like a cliche before I knew the word, which is much better than feeling like I don't exist but I still found it unpleasant. 

I think that part of why I noticed this lack of diversity is because I'd been reading a comic series called ElfQuest for years. The pages were full of colorful images of beauty and adventure, and to me there was no one - no Disney princess, pop idol, or movie star - who was more perfect than Wendy Pini's Leetah. In addition to being beautiful, she was compassionate, brave, purposeful, intelligent, and very protective of her independence. I loved her. I still want to grow up to be her.

Elfquest art copyright Warp Graphics, Inc. Elfquest, its logos, characters, situations, all related indicia, and their distinctive likenesses are trademarks of Warp Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved.

< What went here? Introduced whitewashing... >>

You can find examples of Hollywood whitewashing here and here (and lots of other places, like your TV). We expect this type of thing from the olden days of racisms gone by, but it's shocking how often it still happens today. 

For instance, I recently learned that the casting call for the lead role in The Hunger Games asked for Caucasian females only, despite Katniss being described in the books as having olive skin and dark hair. While Caucasians can fit that description, so can a lot of other people. I think Jennifer Lawrence was a great choice and I'm not sad about it, but I also think this was a missed opportunity. People of color seem to be particularly under-represented in the sci-fi and fantasy genres, and who's to say there wasn't a darker skinned Katniss out there who would've been just as good or even better than Jennifer Lawrence? They didn't even look for her.

I've heard people defend the casting call by saying, "They're probably just trying to reach a target demographic - people who are reading the books." I'm not even sure what that means. Do people with brown skin not read books? Do they just not read sci-fi or YA fiction? In my 32 years I've found that people who read come in many different varieties, but they all have this in common: if they read the book, they will ALWAYS want accuracy over any other convenience in the movie. The fans get it.

Well, most of them do. There was a big uproar when the Hunger Games movie came out and little Rue was found to be black, despite her being described as having dark brown skin in the book. And I'm not talking about, "Huh, I didn't realize Rue was black, did you? I must've overlooked that." I mean some really ugly business.


The Hunger Games is far from the only example of whitewashing from recent film making. When a live action version of the popular cartoon Avatar: The Last Airbender was cast, many fans noticed something fishy:

Source: http://colorlines.com/archives/2010/07/whitewashing_of_hollywood.html

In the upcoming Jem and the Holograms movie, Shana is going to be played by Aurora Perrineau. I don't know her ethnicity; she may be black, but she is not as dark as the original cartoon version of the character. Of course, light skinned women of color have just as much of a right to representation as anyone else and I'm sure Aurora Perrineau will do a fine job, I just think it's telling that, yet again, Hollywood has picked the lightest version of black they could find. When you consider that Shana was a token black character to begin with the casting choice just seems insulting.

It's tempting to say that whitewashing doesn't matter, and I'll agree that there is the potential to get too picky. For example, it doesn't offend me if an actor is a different variety of Asian than the character he plays any more than when a Canadian actor plays an American character, but it does bother some people. Changes are often made to characters in order to accommodate the actors. They changed the character history of Mark Thackery in the movie To Sir, With Love to explain Sidney Poitier's American accent. Vivien Leigh, who played Scarlett O'Hara in Gone with the Wind, was not an American southern belle. She was British, so she had to use acting to become a southern belle. Furthermore, they used movie magic to change her eyes to green. Should skin color or ethnicity matter any more than Vivien Leigh's eyes in Gone with The Wind? And isn't acting pretending, anyway? Maybe sometimes an actor can fit a part even if his ethnicity doesn't. Why should it matter? 

It matters because it's not equal. Saying that looks are secondary to a character's nature or personality is fine. However, when there's a pattern of changes to looks only going one direction it's not ok. If we were just as likely to see a black actor in a role that was written white as the other way around maybe it wouldn't matter, but that's not the world we live in. There's got to be a reason for that, and it can't be a very good one. 

It also matters because it's like saying, "We like everything about you except for you." The African queen Cleopatra is an appealing character for a movie. She was rich and beautiful and powerful and interesting... we better cast a white lady so that she's glamorous enough, or relatable enough, or just so that we're comfortable looking at her. We'll take all the parts of her and give them to this white lady to make them better. Once when I was a freshman in high school... << tell appropriation story >>

Not many people notice when a dark skinned character is lightened but when the shoe is on the other foot it suddenly seems to matter. When the actor Michael B. Jordan was cast as the Human Torch, there was an uproar, and that's not the only time this has happened. Check out this clip from Donald Glover's stadup special Weirdo from 2012 (but watch out for F words if you're sensitive to those things):

<< weirdo clip >>

Hollywood isn't the only group who whitewashes. Please read this interesting and fantastic article about YA book covers. Furthermore, think of the magazines you see at the grocery store. Magazines with white people on the cover are for everybody, but magazines with black people on the cover are for black people because white is the default normal thing to be and anything else is specialty interest. Often when black women are cover girls, they get whitewashed in another way: the beauty whitewash. Have a look: 

Tiana does not see the need for this.

I was really excited when I heard that Disney was going to give us a black princess. I was worried that they'd make her fair skinned or give her European features. Obviously there's nothing wrong with having fair skin and European features (whether you're a woman of color or not), but this was going to be the first black leading lady from Disney and I wanted her to be very obviously black. I wondered how her prince would look, too. Would a black prince say, "She's nice, but we still can't mix with each other?" Would a white prince say, "We'll give you the black heroine, but a black hero is asking too much?" I was thrilled that Prince Naveen was dark skinned, but not darker than Tiana. We have a weird habit of associating fair with feminine. Ancient art from all over the world depicts couples where the female is pale and the male is darker. We still think that way. There's a book about it. If you don't believe me, do a Google image search for, "Disney kiss." Of course, as frogs it was reversed (that's a trope), but as people she is darker, and that is a victory.

I could go on and on about this, and I'll probably bring it up again in the future, but for now I'd like to end on a quote from a commenter on the This Could Have Been Frozen blog: 

"Figure out why you're upset about dark people in your 'white' fairy tale and not the lions in your Hamlet."

Girls and Boys and Math

A couple of weird things happened in my math class this morning. 

1: Several people from the class were sitting around before the professor arrived. One kid, who must be fresh out of high school, declared sagely, "You know, if she's 15 minutes late we can all leave." It struck me as so juvenile and ridiculous. First of all, the teacher wasn't late; we were all early. Second, I've heard that little nugget of wisdom several times since I was in junior high, and it's been a favorite thing to say among would-be rebels since long before my time. Third, and most importantly, THIS IS COLLEGE. It's not like there's a truant officer. If you don't feel like going to class, don't go to class. No one is going to force you. In fact, you have to pay to be here. That's kind of like going to a concert and saying, "If the band isn't on time we can all leave, you know." Yeah. We know.

2: My math teacher divides our class into small work groups, which she changes periodically. So she teaches us some new thing, we do a few practice examples and check with our groups, then she explains the correct answers and how to get them. We got new groups today, and I found myself sitting with 1 male and 4 other females. The male is about 18 and, based on class participation, I don't think he's particularly good at math. I don't think he's particularly bad, either, but whenever there's a Hermione or a Stephen Hawking in a class you tend to know who they are, and I've seen him make mistakes before like the rest of us peasants. So we were in our new groups, and we'd been given this problem: 

"A rocket is stopped 20 feet from a satellite when it begins accelerating away from the satellite at a constant rate of 14 feet per second squared. The distance between the rocket and the satellite is given by the polynomial 7t² + 20. Find the distance between the rocket and the satellite 8 seconds after the rocket started moving."

Now, I wasn't exactly sure how to solve this problem, but I was fairly certain that we needed to put that 8 with the 14 feet per second squared (as in 14(8)², maybe), so I told the group I'd gotten that far and asked for help. The boy completely disagreed with me. He thought that the 8 seconds was extra information meant to throw us off and that we should ignore that part of the word problem. I said that the question is to determine how far the rocket gets in 8 seconds, so it's relevant, but he was so cock-sure and everyone agreed with him. I think it's because he's a boy and we all think boys are better at math than girls. By that I mean I think he was confident despite making as many mistakes as anyone else in the class because of this cultural training, and I think he was unwilling to listen to reason because of this cultural training, and I think everyone went along with him (at least partly) because of this cultural training. I wish I could remember exactly what he was saying about how to work the problem without the 8, but it didn't make sense to me so I just agreed to disagree until the teacher gave us the answer. I was on the right track; you solve it with 7(8)² + 20, and the answer is 468 feet. This doesn't mean that he's stupid and I'm smart, it's just very interesting that everyone was willing to listen to him when he wasn't making sense and clearly didn't know what he was talking about. I believed my whole life that I'm not good at math but I'm actually doing pretty well in this class. We've all been had.